Why Akathleptos?

Why Akathleptos? Because it means Uncontainable. God is infinite. Hence, the whole universe cannot contain Him. The term also refers to the incomprehensibility of God. No man can know everything about God. We can know Him personally but not exhaustively, not even in Heaven.

Why Patmos? Because the church is increasingly marginalized and exiled from the culture.

Why Pen-Names? So the focus is on the words and not who wrote them. We prefer to let what we say stand on its own merit. There is precedent in church history for this - i.e., the elusive identity of Ambrosiaster who wrote in the 4th century A.D.

“Truth is so obscured nowadays, and lies so well established, that unless we love the truth we shall never recognize it." Blaise Pascal

Saturday, October 22, 2016

We Are Well Past The Time To Draw A Line In The Sand

... ethicist David Gushee proclaimed there was no more middle ground on LGBT issues. He’s right. You either approve of so-called sexually progressive ideas or you don’t—and if you don’t, you’ve placed yourself in the bigoted, wrong-side-of-history category.

That’s exactly what happened with InterVarsity Christian Fellowship. Earlier this month, IV informed employees that they were expected to align with traditional Christian teaching on marriage and human sexuality. If they couldn’t, they were asked to come forward.

TIME magazine reported on the announcement this way. “One of the largest evangelical organizations on college campuses nationwide “has told its 1,300 staff members they will be fired if they personally support gay marriage or otherwise disagree with its newly detailed positions on sexuality starting on November 11.” They called it a “theological purge.”

But they completely misreported the story.

This was no out-of-nowhere,  drop-the-bomb announcement. IV conducted a four-year study of human sexuality and the Bible to write a 20 page position paper, that wasn’t limited to beliefs about homosexuality or same-sex marriage. They then initiated an 18-month process of communicating their positions to staff, which was simply a clarified version of what they’d always held on these issues. “The goal,” according to IV, “was to clarify our position while also providing ample time for those whose convictions differed to seek out better-fitting ministry opportunities.”

Staff were given the paper in March 2015, not last week. And they offered to help those who didn’t align with their convictions with their transition to different employment.

In other words, IV affirmed what Christians have always believed about sexuality until culturally yesterday. As expected, some staff—though as I understand it, very few—didn’t align with the new policy. Some were upset, which is to be expected. But I don’t know a single organization, much less a Christian organization, that doesn’t expect employees to align with their values.

And it wasn’t only Time online that erupted. A group of progressive, what I would call “post-evangelical,” leaders wrote IV urging the ministry to reverse the “dangerous precedent” set by its policy “regarding LGBTQ affirming staff.”

But that is obfuscation and spin. IV welcomes LGBTQ students into fellowships. And IV expects its staff to affirm and love everyone, as they’re made in God’s image. Staff must also affirm the full gamut of biblical teaching on human sexuality and marriage as communicated in their position document. This wasn’t just about same-sex marriage.

In other words, there’s nothing out of line here. The outrage stems from a sort of moral evolution on the parts of both Time and these post-evangelicals, that eventually all will reach the enlightened position on these matters. They seem genuinely surprised when some don’t, and then make it out as if non-affirming Christians are somehow the ones who are obsessed with these issues.

Don’t buy it. The current state of the culture forces people to take sides, and increasingly, so do the courts.

There are plenty of lessons to be learned here, but at least know this: InterVarsity did everything right. It upheld Christian teaching in a way that was inclusive, respectful, and gave people opportunity for input . . . they followed a long, thoughtful process, and treated those who dissent with respect. Just know: you can do everything right, but having the so-called “wrong view” on any pelvic issue is going to cost you these days.

(Story is here.)


Christians that try to ride the fence on progressive sexuality (or worse yet, outright approve of it) are opening Pandora's Box. There are times when a line must be drawn in the sand and this is clearly one of them given the Scriptures crystal-clear teaching on sexuality and church teaching for the past 2,000 years. Progressive sexuality is terrible bondage masking itself as "freedom" and marketed to a culture that has abrogated truth for a distorted version of reality.

There is a time when a line must be drawn in the sand. We are well past that time.

Now the Spirit says clearly that in the last times some people will abandon the faith by following deceitful spirits, the teachings of demons (1 Tim 4:1)

Therefore we must pay much closer attention to what we have heard, lest we drift away from it (Heb 2:1)

No comments:

Post a Comment