Why Akathleptos?

Why Akathleptos? Because it means Uncontainable. God is infinite. Hence, the whole universe cannot contain Him. The term also refers to the incomprehensibility of God. No man can know everything about God. We can know Him personally but not exhaustively, not even in Heaven.

Why Patmos? Because the church is increasingly marginalized and exiled from the culture.

Why Pen-Names? So the focus is on the words and not who wrote them. We prefer to let what we say stand on its own merit. There is precedent in church history for this - i.e., the elusive identity of Ambrosiaster who wrote in the 4th century A.D.

“Truth is so obscured nowadays, and lies so well established, that unless we love the truth we shall never recognize it." Blaise Pascal

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Muslims Are Masters At Deception

As I documented here, Islam permits deceit to infidels (Taqiyya - saying something that isn't true; kitman - Lying by omission) and mandates that it is the will of Allah to bring the entire world under the subjugation of Islamic (sharia) law.

Khizr Khan who spoke at the Democratic National Convention is the Muslim father of a slain American soldier. Now it turns out that he is also an attorney who previously wrote in a law journal about Islamic law as revealed here:

Khizr Khan, the Muslim father of a slain American soldier, is an attorney who has previously written in a law journal about Islamic law. He specifically wrote about the purity of the Quran and the Sunnah over all other texts and interpretations.

Khan rose to fame after speaking at the Democratic National Convention Thursday and pulling out a pocket U.S. Constitution imploring if Donald Trump had even read it.

Khan wrote “Juristic Classification Of Islamic Law” in the Houston Journal of International Law in 1983. In it he breaks down different levels of Islamic law. Khan writes that the Quran and the Sunnah which were both directly created by the Muslim prophet Muhammad were the only sources in Muhammad’s lifetime that “were recognized as binding.”

... Khan writes, “to Muslims, the Quran being the very word of God, it is the absolute authority from which springs the very conception of legality and every legal obligation.”


Ironically, Mr Khan waved a copy of the U.S. constitution during his impassioned denunciation. I must conclude one of two things from his speech:
  1. As a lawyer, either he knows sharia law conflicts with the U.S. constitution and so is being purposely deceitful (exercising Taqiyya), or
  2. He is an apostate Muslim, holding the U.S. constitution above sharia law.
Given his background in Islamic jurisprudence, I have to believe that option 1 is far more likely.

(It's also interesting to note that he deleted his law firm’s website from the Internet. This development is significant, as his website proved—as Breitbart News and others reported (i.e., here and here) — that he financially benefits from unfettered pay-to-play Muslim migration into America.)

Paul Sperry agrees with in his editorial here entitled "Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution ‘Must Always Be Subordinated to the Sharia’".

Notwithstanding his war-hero son’s genuinely patriotic example, Khizr M. Khan has published papers supporting the supremacy of Islamic law over “man-made” Western law — including the very Constitution he championed in his Democratic National Convention speech attacking GOP presidential nod Donald Trump.

In 1983, for example, Khan wrote a glowing review of a book compiled from a seminar held in Kuwait called “Human Rights In Islam” in which he singles out for praise the keynote address of fellow Pakistani Allah K. Brohi, a pro-jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisers to late Pakistani dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement.

Khan speaks admiringly of Brohi’s interpretation of human rights, even though it included the right to kill and mutilate those who violate Islamic laws and even the right of men to “beat” wives who act “unseemly.”

Muslims are masters at deception.

No comments:

Post a Comment